Guinea-Bissau vs Heard and McDonald Islands

Guinea-Bissau is 98.2 times larger than Heard and McDonald Islands. Heard and McDonald Islands would fit into Guinea-Bissau about 98 times.

Guinea-BissauHeard and McDonald IslandsGuinea-Bissau moved onto Heard and McDonald Islands · Equal-area projection
98.2×
Guinea-Bissau is 98.2× the area of Heard and McDonald Islands.
Guinea-BissauHeard and McDonald Islands
Area36,125 km²368 km²
Population2,249,515
Density62 / km²
CapitalBissau
RegionWestern AfricaSeven seas (open ocean)
CoastlineHas a coastHas a coast
Neighbours20

Why the map you grew up with disagrees

On a Mercator map, area grows with distance from the equator. Guinea-Bissau sits at about 12°N and is stretched to 1.05× its true area; Heard and McDonald Islands at 53° S is stretched to 2.77×. That difference is why Heard and McDonald Islands looks so much bigger than it is next to Guinea-Bissau. The figure above uses the Equal Earth projection, where every square kilometre is drawn the same size.

Questions about this pair

Is Guinea-Bissau bigger than Heard and McDonald Islands?
Yes. Guinea-Bissau is 98.2 times larger than Heard and McDonald Islands. Guinea-Bissau covers 36,125 km² and Heard and McDonald Islands covers 368 km².
How many times does Heard and McDonald Islands fit into Guinea-Bissau?
About 98 times: Guinea-Bissau has 98.2× the area of Heard and McDonald Islands.
Why do Guinea-Bissau and Heard and McDonald Islands look different on Google Maps?
Web maps use the Mercator projection, which stretches area with distance from the equator. Guinea-Bissau is drawn about 1.05× its true area there and Heard and McDonald Islands about 2.77×. That is why Heard and McDonald Islands looks so much bigger than it really is next to Guinea-Bissau. Kartavera uses Equal Earth, where every square kilometre is drawn the same size.