Equatorial Guinea vs Turks and Caicos Islands

Equatorial Guinea is 67.3 times larger than Turks and Caicos Islands. Turks and Caicos Islands would fit into Equatorial Guinea about 67 times.

Equatorial GuineaTurks and Caicos IslandsEquatorial Guinea moved onto Turks and Caicos Islands · Equal-area projection
67.3×
Equatorial Guinea is 67.3× the area of Turks and Caicos Islands.
Equatorial GuineaTurks and Caicos Islands
Area28,051 km²417 km²
Population1,938,43146,855
Density69 / km²112 / km²
CapitalMalaboGrand Turk
RegionMiddle AfricaCaribbean
CoastlineHas a coastHas a coast
Neighbours20

Why the map you grew up with disagrees

On a Mercator map, area grows with distance from the equator. Equatorial Guinea sits at about 2°N and is stretched to 1.0× its true area; Turks and Caicos Islands at 22° N is stretched to 1.16×. Here the two are distorted about the same amount, so Mercator gets this pair roughly right. The figure above uses the Equal Earth projection, where every square kilometre is drawn the same size.

Questions about this pair

Is Equatorial Guinea bigger than Turks and Caicos Islands?
Yes. Equatorial Guinea is 67.3 times larger than Turks and Caicos Islands. Equatorial Guinea covers 28,051 km² and Turks and Caicos Islands covers 417 km².
How many times does Turks and Caicos Islands fit into Equatorial Guinea?
About 67 times: Equatorial Guinea has 67.3× the area of Turks and Caicos Islands.
Why do Equatorial Guinea and Turks and Caicos Islands look different on Google Maps?
Web maps use the Mercator projection, which stretches area with distance from the equator. Equatorial Guinea is drawn about 1.0× its true area there and Turks and Caicos Islands about 1.16×. For this pair the distortion is similar, so Mercator gets the comparison roughly right. Kartavera uses Equal Earth, where every square kilometre is drawn the same size.
Which has more people, Equatorial Guinea or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Equatorial Guinea: 1,938,431 people against 46,855. Density: Equatorial Guinea 69 per km², Turks and Caicos Islands 112 per km².