Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia
Zambia is 1,805 times larger than Turks and Caicos Islands. Turks and Caicos Islands would fit into Zambia about 1805 times.
Turks and Caicos IslandsZambiaTurks and Caicos Islands moved onto Zambia · Equal-area projection
0.0×
Turks and Caicos Islands is 0.0× the area of Zambia. Put the other way, Zambia is 1,805× the size of Turks and Caicos Islands.
| Turks and Caicos Islands | Zambia | |
|---|---|---|
| Area | 417 km² | 752,618 km² |
| Population | 46,855 | 21,913,874 |
| Density | 112 / km² | 29 / km² |
| Capital | Grand Turk | Lusaka |
| Region | Caribbean | Eastern Africa |
| Coastline | Has a coast | Landlocked |
| Neighbours | 0 | 7 |
Why the map you grew up with disagrees
On a Mercator map, area grows with distance from the equator. Turks and Caicos Islands sits at about 22°N and is stretched to 1.16× its true area; Zambia at 13° S is stretched to 1.06×. Here the two are distorted about the same amount, so Mercator gets this pair roughly right. The figure above uses the Equal Earth projection, where every square kilometre is drawn the same size.
Questions about this pair
- Is Turks and Caicos Islands bigger than Zambia?
- No. Turks and Caicos Islands is 1,805 times smaller than Zambia. Turks and Caicos Islands covers 417 km² and Zambia covers 752,618 km².
- How many times does Turks and Caicos Islands fit into Zambia?
- About 1805 times: Zambia has 1,805× the area of Turks and Caicos Islands.
- Why do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia look different on Google Maps?
- Web maps use the Mercator projection, which stretches area with distance from the equator. Turks and Caicos Islands is drawn about 1.16× its true area there and Zambia about 1.06×. For this pair the distortion is similar, so Mercator gets the comparison roughly right. Kartavera uses Equal Earth, where every square kilometre is drawn the same size.
- Which has more people, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zambia?
- Zambia: 21,913,874 people against 46,855. Density: Turks and Caicos Islands 112 per km², Zambia 29 per km².